We thought we’d continue with the Swedish theme. Clearly we can’t get Wapiti (Elk) Meat locally, so we just went with boneless belly Pork and winged it…
Ingredients:-
500g of Belly Pork, cubed with the rind removed
1 Onion, chopped
2 Carrots, chopped
1 Leek, chopped
1 Parsnip, chopped
1 Bay Leaf
1 Sprig of Thyme
10 Peppercorns
Salt to season
Dill Reduction Ingredients:-
50g of Fresh Dill
120ml of Water
3 Tbsp of White Wine Vinegar
3 Peppercorns
40g of Sugar
120ml of Milk (Lactose free for us)
2 Tbsp of Ground Cashew Nuts
2 Tbsp of Cornflour mixed with a little water
Method:-
(1) Put the Pork in a pan and cover with cold water.
(2) Bring to the boil covered for a couple of minutes.
(3) Drain and rinse the Pork and clean out the pan.
(4) Return the Pork with the Onions, Carrot, Leek, Bay Leaf, Thyme, Peppercorn and season with Salt.
(5) Add enough water to cover everything and bring to the boil.
(6) Reduce the heat and simmer for about an hour.
(7) For the Dill reduction remove the fronds from the stems and set aside.
(8) Put the stems, Water,Peppercorns, Sugar and Vinegar in a pan and boil for 5 minutes.
(9) Set aside to cool.
(10) When the meat is cooked strain and reserve about 450ml of the stock.
(11) Return the Meat and Vegetables to the pan with the 450ml of stock.
(12) Whisk the Milk and Cashew Nuts together and add to the pan over a low heat.
(13) Add the Dill reduction and season to taste.
(14) Thicken with Cornflour and Water mixture stirring regularly.
(15) Serve garnished with the Dill fronds.
Although we loved the Dill flavours we found the sauce to be a bit too sweet for us. It was probably because we are , having to use Cashew Nuts + Lactose free Milk to replace Cream in sauces. So the sweetness of the Cashew Nuts, plus the Sugar and the sweetness of the root vegetables probably all combined.
Here is what Professor Philip Alston Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights for the UN has to say about poverty in the UK in 2018
I have actually found the original report which is here (Just in case I'm seen to be misquoting)
“ …......While the labour and housing markets provide the crucial backdrop, the focus of this report is on the contribution made by social security and related policies.
The results? 14 million people, a fifth of the population, live in poverty. Four million of these are more than 50% below the poverty line, and 1.5 million are destitute, unable to afford basic essentials. The widely respected Institute for Fiscal Studies predicts a 7% rise in child poverty between 2015 and 2022, and various sources predict child poverty rates of as high as 40%. For almost one in every two children to be poor in twenty-first century Britain is not just a disgrace, but a social calamity and an economic disaster, all rolled into one.
…...............
Although the provision of social security to those in need is a public service and a vital anchor to prevent people being pulled into poverty, the policies put in place since 2010 are usually discussed under the rubric of austerity. But this framing leads the inquiry in the wrong direction. In the area of poverty-related policy, the evidence points to the conclusion that the driving force has not been economic but rather a commitment to achieving radical social re-engineering. Successive governments have brought revolutionary change in both the system for delivering minimum levels of fairness and social justice to the British people, and especially in the values underpinning it. Key elements of the post-war Beveridge social contract are being overturned. In the process, some good outcomes have certainly been achieved, but great misery has also been inflicted unnecessarily, especially on the working poor, on single mothers struggling against mighty odds, on people with disabilities who are already marginalized, and on millions of children who are being locked into a cycle of poverty from which most will have great difficulty escaping.
….............
In addition to all of the negative publicity about Universal Credit in the UK media and among politicians of all parties, I have heard countless stories from people who told me of the severe hardships they have suffered under Universal Credit. When asked about these problems, Government ministers were almost entirely dismissive, blaming political opponents for wanting to sabotage their work, or suggesting that the media didn’t really understand the system and that Universal Credit was unfairly blamed for problems rooted in the old legacy system of benefits. “
The full report is 24 pages long and these are only extracts. Very little of the remainder of the report is any more positive however.